Congo vs Sudan: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Congo
63.7%
in 2022
Sudan
63.3%
in 2022
Congo rank
17th
Sudan rank
18th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Congo
- Sudan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 63.7% against 63.3% in Sudan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 17th and Sudan ranks 18th of 134 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.3% | 54.0% | 24.3% | Congo |
| 2010s | 59.4% | 66.0% | 6.6% | Sudan |
| 2020s | 63.7% | 63.3% | 0.4% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Congo or Sudan?
- Congo, at 63.7% against 63.3% in Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Congo and Sudan?
- 0.4%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Sudan rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Congo ranks 17th and Sudan ranks 18th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.