Chad vs Estonia: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Chad
82.4%
in 2022
Estonia
78.3%
in 2020
Chad rank
11th
Estonia rank
12th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Chad
- Estonia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 82.4% against 78.3% in Estonia, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 12th of 134 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.4% | 90.7% | 13.3% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 73.3% | 87.9% | 14.7% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 76.6% | 78.3% | 1.7% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Chad or Estonia?
- Chad, at 82.4% against 78.3% in Estonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Chad and Estonia?
- 4.1%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Estonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Chad and Estonia rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Chad ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 12th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.