Central African Republic vs IDA only: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Central African Republic
89.7%
in 2008
IDA only
56.4%
in 2018
Central African Republic rank
5th
IDA only rank
3rd
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Central African Republic
- IDA only
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 89.7% against 56.4% in IDA only, a difference of 33.3%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.6 times IDA only's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 5th and IDA only ranks 3rd of 134 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Central African Republic or IDA only?
- Central African Republic, at 89.7% against 56.4% in IDA only as of 2008.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Central African Republic and IDA only?
- 33.3%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and IDA only?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2008.
- How do Central African Republic and IDA only rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Central African Republic ranks 5th and IDA only ranks 3rd of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.