Burundi vs IDA total: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Burundi
97.8%
in 2022
IDA total
52.4%
in 2018
Burundi rank
2nd
IDA total rank
5th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Burundi
- IDA total
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 97.8% against 52.4% in IDA total, a difference of 45.4%.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.9 times IDA total's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 2nd and IDA total ranks 5th of 134 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | IDA total | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.7% | 68.0% | 30.7% | Burundi |
| 2010s | 94.5% | 58.5% | 36.0% | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Burundi or IDA total?
- Burundi, at 97.8% against 52.4% in IDA total as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Burundi and IDA total?
- 45.4%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and IDA total?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Burundi and IDA total rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Burundi ranks 2nd and IDA total ranks 5th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.