Burundi vs IDA only: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Burundi
97.8%
in 2022
IDA only
56.4%
in 2018
Burundi rank
2nd
IDA only rank
3rd
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Burundi
- IDA only
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 97.8% against 56.4% in IDA only, a difference of 41.4%.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.7 times IDA only's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 2nd and IDA only ranks 3rd of 134 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | IDA only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.9% | 67.7% | 31.2% | Burundi |
| 2010s | 94.8% | 62.2% | 32.7% | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Burundi or IDA only?
- Burundi, at 97.8% against 56.4% in IDA only as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Burundi and IDA only?
- 41.4%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and IDA only?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Burundi and IDA only rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Burundi ranks 2nd and IDA only ranks 3rd of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.