Burundi vs Cote d'Ivoire: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Burundi
97.8%
in 2022
Cote d'Ivoire
100.0%
in 2022
Burundi rank
2nd
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Burundi
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 100.0% against 97.8% in Burundi, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Burundi ranks 2nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 134 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Cote d'Ivoire in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.9% | 100.0% | 1.1% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 94.8% | 99.8% | 5.0% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 98.5% | 98.2% | 0.3% | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Burundi or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 100.0% against 97.8% in Burundi as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Burundi and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 2.2%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Burundi and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Burundi ranks 2nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.