Belarus vs Switzerland: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Belarus
1.5%
in 2022
Switzerland
1.0%
in 2022
Belarus rank
101st
Switzerland rank
102nd
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Belarus
- Switzerland
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.5% against 1.0% in Switzerland, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 101st and Switzerland ranks 102nd of 134 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.8% | 1.8% | 16.0% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 6.6% | 1.3% | 5.2% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 1.0% | 0.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Belarus or Switzerland?
- Belarus, at 1.5% against 1.0% in Switzerland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Belarus and Switzerland?
- 0.5%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Switzerland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Switzerland rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Belarus ranks 101st and Switzerland ranks 102nd of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.