Angola vs Guinea: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Angola
51.7%
in 2022
Guinea
57.5%
in 2019
Angola rank
24th
Guinea rank
21st
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Angola
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 57.5% against 51.7% in Angola, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 24th and Guinea ranks 21st of 134 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.9% | 77.9% | 26.0% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 38.6% | 65.0% | 26.4% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Angola or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 57.5% against 51.7% in Angola as of 2019.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Angola and Guinea?
- 5.8%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Guinea rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Angola ranks 24th and Guinea ranks 21st of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.