Angola vs Comoros: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Angola
51.7%
in 2022
Comoros
47.8%
in 2022
Angola rank
24th
Comoros rank
27th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Angola
- Comoros
How they compare
Angola currently reports 51.7% against 47.8% in Comoros, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 24th and Comoros ranks 27th of 134 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Comoros in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.0% | 62.9% | 8.9% | Comoros |
| 2010s | 38.6% | 51.7% | 13.1% | Comoros |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 47.3% | 6.4% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Angola or Comoros?
- Angola, at 51.7% against 47.8% in Comoros as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Angola and Comoros?
- 3.9%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Comoros?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Angola and Comoros rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Angola ranks 24th and Comoros ranks 27th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.