Angola vs Bangladesh: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Angola
51.7%
in 2022
Bangladesh
51.0%
in 2022
Angola rank
24th
Bangladesh rank
26th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Angola
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Angola currently reports 51.7% against 51.0% in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Angola ranks 24th and Bangladesh ranks 26th of 134 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.9% | 84.2% | 32.3% | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 37.8% | 70.9% | 33.1% | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 56.3% | 2.6% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Angola or Bangladesh?
- Angola, at 51.7% against 51.0% in Bangladesh as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Angola and Bangladesh?
- 0.7%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bangladesh?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Angola and Bangladesh rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Angola ranks 24th and Bangladesh ranks 26th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.