Uzbekistan vs Zimbabwe: Retreatment cases: treatment after failure
Uzbekistan
190
in 2012
Zimbabwe
200
in 2012
Uzbekistan rank
31st
Zimbabwe rank
30th
Retreatment cases: treatment after failure over time
- Uzbekistan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 200 against 190 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 10.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 178 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 348.5 | 18.5 | 330 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 215.33 | 170.33 | 45 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after failure, Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 200 against 190 in Uzbekistan as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after failure between Uzbekistan and Zimbabwe?
- 10, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Uzbekistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after failure?
- Uzbekistan ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after failure (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.