Nepal vs Zimbabwe: Retreatment cases: treatment after failure
Nepal
234
in 2012
Zimbabwe
200
in 2012
Nepal rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
30th
Retreatment cases: treatment after failure over time
- Nepal
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 234 against 200 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 34.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 178 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 271 | 18.5 | 252.5 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 256.67 | 170.33 | 86.33 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after failure, Nepal or Zimbabwe?
- Nepal, at 234 against 200 in Zimbabwe as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after failure between Nepal and Zimbabwe?
- 34, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Nepal and Zimbabwe rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after failure?
- Nepal ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after failure (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.