China vs South Africa: Retreatment cases: treatment after failure
China
2,281
in 2012
South Africa
3,123
in 2012
China rank
5th
South Africa rank
3rd
Retreatment cases: treatment after failure over time
- China
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 3,123 against 2,281 in China, a difference of 842.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.4 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1997 it was China ahead.
China ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,773 | 74 | 36,699 | China |
| 2000s | 2,798 | 2,937 | 139 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 2,481 | 2,791 | 310 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after failure, China or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 3,123 against 2,281 in China as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after failure between China and South Africa?
- 842, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and South Africa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2012.
- How do China and South Africa rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after failure?
- China ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after failure (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.