Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Retreatment cases: treatment after failure
Afghanistan
160
in 2012
Zimbabwe
200
in 2012
Afghanistan rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
30th
Retreatment cases: treatment after failure over time
- Afghanistan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 200 against 160 in Afghanistan, a difference of 40.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 24.67 | 25.33 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 147.67 | 170.33 | 22.67 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after failure, Afghanistan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 200 against 160 in Afghanistan as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after failure between Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
- 40, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Afghanistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after failure?
- Afghanistan ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after failure (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.