Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Equatorial Guinea
17
in 2011
Latvia
16
in 2012
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Latvia rank
95th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Latvia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 17 against 16 in Latvia, a difference of 1.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Latvia ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 95th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1 | 92 | 91 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 10 | 23.67 | 13.67 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 22 | 14 | 8 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Equatorial Guinea or Latvia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 17 against 16 in Latvia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
- 1, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Latvia rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 95th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.