Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Ecuador
136
in 2012
Zimbabwe
176
in 2012
Ecuador rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
43rd
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 176 against 136 in Ecuador, a difference of 40.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 180 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 189.75 | 205.75 | 16 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 146 | 161.67 | 15.67 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 176 against 136 in Ecuador as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 40, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Ecuador ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.