Ecuador vs Namibia: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Ecuador
136
in 2012
Namibia
133
in 2012
Ecuador rank
45th
Namibia rank
47th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 136 against 133 in Namibia, a difference of 3.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 47th of 180 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 196.4 | 118 | 78.4 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 146 | 130.67 | 15.33 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 136 against 133 in Namibia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 3, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Ecuador ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 47th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.