China vs Uganda: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
China
738
in 2012
Uganda
1,164
in 2012
China rank
13th
Uganda rank
10th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- China
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 1,164 against 738 in China, a difference of 426.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.6 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1999 it was China ahead.
China ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 10th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,692 | 706 | 27,986 | China |
| 2000s | 1,850 | 1,046 | 803.5 | China |
| 2010s | 909 | 1,193 | 284 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, China or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 1,164 against 738 in China as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between China and Uganda?
- 426, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do China and Uganda rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- China ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 10th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.