Chile vs Rwanda: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Chile
33
in 2012
Rwanda
27
in 2012
Chile rank
78th
Rwanda rank
81st
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Chile currently reports 33 against 27 in Rwanda, a difference of 6.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 81st of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.67 | 60.33 | 27.67 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 48.71 | 41.14 | 7.57 | Chile |
| 2010s | 33.67 | 31.67 | 2 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Chile or Rwanda?
- Chile, at 33 against 27 in Rwanda as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Chile and Rwanda?
- 6, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2012.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Chile ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 81st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.