Chad vs Namibia: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Chad
125
in 2012
Namibia
133
in 2012
Chad rank
49th
Namibia rank
47th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Chad
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 133 against 125 in Chad, a difference of 8.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 47th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 116.5 | 125 | 8.5 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 132 | 130.67 | 1.33 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Chad or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 133 against 125 in Chad as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Chad and Namibia?
- 8, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Chad ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 47th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.