Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Central African Republic
150
in 2012
Zimbabwe
176
in 2012
Central African Republic rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
43rd
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Central African Republic
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 176 against 150 in Central African Republic, a difference of 26.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 122.33 | 75.67 | 46.67 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 104 | 161.67 | 57.67 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Central African Republic or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 176 against 150 in Central African Republic as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 26, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Central African Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Central African Republic ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.