Central African Republic vs Namibia: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Central African Republic
150
in 2012
Namibia
133
in 2012
Central African Republic rank
44th
Namibia rank
47th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Central African Republic
- Namibia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 150 against 133 in Namibia, a difference of 17.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 47th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 170.25 | 100.5 | 69.75 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 104 | 130.67 | 26.67 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Central African Republic or Namibia?
- Central African Republic, at 150 against 133 in Namibia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Central African Republic and Namibia?
- 17, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Central African Republic and Namibia rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Central African Republic ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 47th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.