Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0
in 2012
Iceland
0
in 2012
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
126th
Iceland rank
126th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Iceland
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 against 0 in Iceland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 126th of 180 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 | 0.4 | 2.8 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Iceland?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 against 0 in Iceland as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 126th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.