Australia vs Israel: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Australia
0
in 2012
Israel
0
in 2012
Australia rank
126th
Israel rank
126th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Australia
- Israel
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 against 0 in Israel, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Israel ahead.
Australia ranks 126th and Israel ranks 126th of 180 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 5.5 | 0 | 5.5 | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.33 | 1 | 0.3333 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Australia or Israel?
- Australia, at 0 against 0 in Israel as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Australia and Israel?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Israel?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2012.
- How do Australia and Israel rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Australia ranks 126th and Israel ranks 126th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.