Australia vs Grenada: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Australia
0
in 2012
Grenada
0
in 2012
Australia rank
126th
Grenada rank
126th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Australia
- Grenada
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 against 0 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 126th and Grenada ranks 126th of 180 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.25 | 0.25 | 3 | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.33 | 0 | 1.33 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Australia or Grenada?
- Australia, at 0 against 0 in Grenada as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Australia and Grenada?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Grenada?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2012.
- How do Australia and Grenada rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Australia ranks 126th and Grenada ranks 126th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.