Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Retreatment cases: treatment after default
Australia
0
in 2012
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0
in 2012
Australia rank
126th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
126th
Retreatment cases: treatment after default over time
- Australia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 against 0 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Australia ranks 126th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.5 | 7.5 | 3 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 3.25 | 2 | 1.25 | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.33 | 0 | 1.33 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher retreatment cases: treatment after default, Australia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Australia, at 0 against 0 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2012.
- What is the difference in retreatment cases: treatment after default between Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2012.
- How do Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for retreatment cases: treatment after default?
- Australia ranks 126th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 126th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.