Guam vs Tuvalu: Reported cases of measles, per capita
Guam
0 Cases per person
in 2024
Tuvalu
0 Cases per person
in 2019
Guam rank
146th
Tuvalu rank
146th
Reported cases of measles, per capita over time
- Guam
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 Cases per person against 0 Cases per person in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 Cases per person.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Guam ahead.
Guam ranks 146th and Tuvalu ranks 146th of 205 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0002 Cases per person | 0.0026 Cases per person | 0.0025 Cases per person | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 0.0001 Cases per person | 0.0106 Cases per person | 0.0105 Cases per person | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 0.0003 Cases per person | 0.0009 Cases per person | 0.0006 Cases per person | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 0 Cases per person | 0 Cases per person | 0 Cases per person | Guam |
| 2010s | 0 Cases per person | 0 Cases per person | 0 Cases per person | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, per capita, Guam or Tuvalu?
- Guam, at 0 Cases per person against 0 Cases per person in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, per capita between Guam and Tuvalu?
- 0 Cases per person, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Tuvalu?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2019.
- How do Guam and Tuvalu rank globally for reported cases of measles, per capita?
- Guam ranks 146th and Tuvalu ranks 146th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported cases of measles divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.