Bangladesh vs East Timor: Reported cases of measles, per capita
Bangladesh
0 Cases per person
in 2024
East Timor
0 Cases per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
123rd
East Timor rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0 Cases per person against 0 Cases per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 Cases per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 123rd and East Timor ranks 122nd of 205 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 Cases per person | 0.0001 Cases per person | 0 Cases per person | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0 Cases per person | 0.0001 Cases per person | 0.0001 Cases per person | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0 Cases per person | 0 Cases per person | 0 Cases per person | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, per capita, Bangladesh or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 0 Cases per person against 0 Cases per person in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, per capita between Bangladesh and East Timor?
- 0 Cases per person, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and East Timor?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and East Timor rank globally for reported cases of measles, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 123rd and East Timor ranks 122nd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported cases of measles divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.