Serbia vs Tanzania: Reported cases of measles, gaps filled
Serbia
892 Cases
in 2024
Tanzania
992 Cases
in 2024
Serbia rank
43rd
Tanzania rank
40th
Reported cases of measles, gaps filled over time
- Serbia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 992 Cases against 892 Cases in Serbia, a difference of 100 Cases.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Tanzania ahead.
Serbia ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 26,417 Cases | 62,512 Cases | 36,095 Cases | Tanzania |
| 1980s | 17,624 Cases | 50,108 Cases | 32,484 Cases | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 3,254 Cases | 11,221 Cases | 7,967 Cases | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 37 Cases | 4,982 Cases | 4,945 Cases | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 664.1 Cases | 483.9 Cases | 180.2 Cases | Serbia |
| 2020s | 188.6 Cases | 923.6 Cases | 735 Cases | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, gaps filled, Serbia or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 992 Cases against 892 Cases in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, gaps filled between Serbia and Tanzania?
- 100 Cases, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tanzania?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Tanzania rank globally for reported cases of measles, gaps filled?
- Serbia ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported cases of measles with 433 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.