Macao vs Nauru: Reported cases of measles, gaps filled
Macao
0 Cases
in 2024
Nauru
0 Cases
in 2024
Macao rank
146th
Nauru rank
146th
Reported cases of measles, gaps filled over time
- Macao
- Nauru
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Nauru, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Nauru ahead.
Macao ranks 146th and Nauru ranks 146th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 4 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 58.67 Cases | 37.67 Cases | 21 Cases | Macao |
| 1980s | 143.8 Cases | 1.5 Cases | 142.3 Cases | Macao |
| 1990s | 4.83 Cases | 69.58 Cases | 64.75 Cases | Nauru |
| 2000s | 1.8 Cases | 0 Cases | 1.8 Cases | Macao |
| 2010s | 4.6 Cases | 2.75 Cases | 1.85 Cases | Macao |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, gaps filled, Macao or Nauru?
- Macao, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, gaps filled between Macao and Nauru?
- 0 Cases, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Nauru?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
- How do Macao and Nauru rank globally for reported cases of measles, gaps filled?
- Macao ranks 146th and Nauru ranks 146th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported cases of measles with 433 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.