Costa Rica vs Macau, China: Reported cases of measles, gaps filled
Costa Rica
0 Cases
in 2024
Macau, China
0 Cases
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
146th
Macau, China rank
146th
Reported cases of measles, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Macau, China
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Macau, China, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 146th and Macau, China ranks 146th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Macau, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2,363 Cases | 91 Cases | 2,272 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 1,032 Cases | 143.8 Cases | 887.9 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 914.1 Cases | 13.8 Cases | 900.3 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.25 Cases | 1.8 Cases | 1.55 Cases | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 1.1 Cases | 4.6 Cases | 3.5 Cases | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 0.2 Cases | 0 Cases | 0.2 Cases | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Macau, China?
- Costa Rica, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Macau, China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Macau, China?
- 0 Cases, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Macau, China?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Macau, China rank globally for reported cases of measles, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 146th and Macau, China ranks 146th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported cases of measles with 433 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.