Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Reported cases of measles, gaps filled
Costa Rica
0 Cases
in 2024
El Salvador
0 Cases
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
146th
El Salvador rank
146th
Reported cases of measles, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- El Salvador
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in El Salvador, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 146th and El Salvador ranks 146th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2,054 Cases | 4,627 Cases | 2,573 Cases | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 1,032 Cases | 2,860 Cases | 1,828 Cases | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 914.1 Cases | 54.8 Cases | 859.3 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.25 Cases | 0.2 Cases | 0.05 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 1.1 Cases | 0 Cases | 1.1 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.2 Cases | 0 Cases | 0.2 Cases | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, gaps filled, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
- Costa Rica, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, gaps filled between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 0 Cases, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for reported cases of measles, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 146th and El Salvador ranks 146th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported cases of measles with 433 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.