Barbados vs Macau, China: Reported cases of measles, gaps filled
Barbados
0 Cases
in 2024
Macau, China
0 Cases
in 2024
Barbados rank
146th
Macau, China rank
146th
Reported cases of measles, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Macau, China
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Macau, China, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 146th and Macau, China ranks 146th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Macau, China in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 482.8 Cases | 91 Cases | 391.8 Cases | Barbados |
| 1980s | 9.9 Cases | 143.8 Cases | 133.9 Cases | Macau, China |
| 1990s | 5.3 Cases | 13.8 Cases | 8.5 Cases | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 0 Cases | 1.8 Cases | 1.8 Cases | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 0 Cases | 4.6 Cases | 4.6 Cases | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, gaps filled, Barbados or Macau, China?
- Barbados, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Macau, China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, gaps filled between Barbados and Macau, China?
- 0 Cases, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Macau, China?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Macau, China rank globally for reported cases of measles, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 146th and Macau, China ranks 146th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported cases of measles with 433 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.