Nauru vs Serbia: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Nauru
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Serbia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Nauru rank
122nd
Serbia rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Nauru
- Serbia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 122nd and Serbia ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -79.38 % change on previous year | -16.84 % change on previous year | 62.53 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1980s | -100 % change on previous year | -41.59 % change on previous year | 58.41 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -86.81 % change on previous year | 13.19 % change on previous year | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Nauru or Serbia?
- Nauru, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 2000.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Nauru and Serbia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2000.
- How do Nauru and Serbia rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Nauru ranks 122nd and Serbia ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.