Macao vs Tokelau: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Macao
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Tokelau
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Macao rank
122nd
Tokelau rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Macao
- Tokelau
How they compare
Macao currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tokelau, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Tokelau ahead.
Macao ranks 122nd and Tokelau ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980s | -71.05 % change on previous year | -99.19 % change on previous year | 28.14 % change on previous year | Macao |
| 2010s | 50 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 150 % change on previous year | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Macao or Tokelau?
- Macao, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tokelau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Macao and Tokelau?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Tokelau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2018.
- How do Macao and Tokelau rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Macao ranks 122nd and Tokelau ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.