Jamaica vs Latvia: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Jamaica
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Jamaica rank
122nd
Latvia rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Jamaica
- Latvia
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -91.22 % change on previous year | -22.02 % change on previous year | 69.2 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010s | -100 % change on previous year | 200 % change on previous year | 300 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Jamaica or Latvia?
- Jamaica, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Jamaica and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2012.
- How do Jamaica and Latvia rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Jamaica ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.