Fiji vs Panama: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Fiji
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
Panama
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Fiji rank
122nd
Panama rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Fiji
- Panama
How they compare
Fiji currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 122nd and Panama ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 15.11 % change on previous year | 115.85 % change on previous year | 100.74 % change on previous year | Panama |
| 1980s | 28.11 % change on previous year | -26.13 % change on previous year | 54.24 % change on previous year | Fiji |
| 1990s | 136.87 % change on previous year | 155.11 % change on previous year | 18.24 % change on previous year | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Fiji or Panama?
- Fiji, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama as of 2010.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Fiji and Panama?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Panama?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1996.
- How do Fiji and Panama rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Fiji ranks 122nd and Panama ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.