Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nicaragua
-100 % change on previous year
in 1996
Eswatini rank
122nd
Nicaragua rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Eswatini
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Nicaragua ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 24.05 % change on previous year | 56.17 % change on previous year | 32.11 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 28.87 % change on previous year | -39.3 % change on previous year | 68.18 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Eswatini or Nicaragua?
- Eswatini, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nicaragua?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 1995.
- How do Eswatini and Nicaragua rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Eswatini ranks 122nd and Nicaragua ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.