Dominica vs Niue: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Dominica
-100 % change on previous year
in 1992
Niue
-100 % change on previous year
in 1995
Dominica rank
122nd
Niue rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Dominica
- Niue
How they compare
Dominica currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Niue, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Niue ahead.
Dominica ranks 122nd and Niue ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980s | -30.01 % change on previous year | 146.67 % change on previous year | 176.68 % change on previous year | Niue |
| 1990s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Dominica or Niue?
- Dominica, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Niue as of 1992.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Dominica and Niue?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Niue?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 1992.
- How do Dominica and Niue rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Dominica ranks 122nd and Niue ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.