Cuba vs Serbia: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 1996
Serbia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Cuba rank
122nd
Serbia rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Serbia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Serbia ahead.
Cuba ranks 122nd and Serbia ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.258 % change on previous year | -3.07 % change on previous year | 3.33 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1980s | 1.49 % change on previous year | 13.56 % change on previous year | 12.07 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1990s | -45.18 % change on previous year | 91.92 % change on previous year | 137.1 % change on previous year | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Cuba or Serbia?
- Cuba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 1996.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Cuba and Serbia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Serbia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1996.
- How do Cuba and Serbia rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 122nd and Serbia ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.