Cuba vs Iceland: Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 1996
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Cuba rank
122nd
Iceland rank
122nd
Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Iceland
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -17.28 % change on previous year | -5.41 % change on previous year | 11.86 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 1980s | 1.49 % change on previous year | 54.2 % change on previous year | 52.71 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 1990s | -45.18 % change on previous year | -25.03 % change on previous year | 20.15 % change on previous year | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reported cases of measles, annual growth rate, Cuba or Iceland?
- Cuba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 1996.
- What is the difference in reported cases of measles, annual growth rate between Cuba and Iceland?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1996.
- How do Cuba and Iceland rank globally for reported cases of measles, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 122nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reported cases of measles, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Reported cases of measles. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.