New Zealand vs Serbia: Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L)
New Zealand
8.5
in 2014
Serbia
8.6
in 2014
New Zealand rank
94th
Serbia rank
91st
Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 8.6 against 8.5 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 94th and Serbia ranks 91st of 189 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.8 | 5.32 | 0.48 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 6.6 | 6.43 | 0.17 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 7.71 | 7.38 | 0.33 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 8.36 | 8.32 | 0.04 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l), New Zealand or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 8.6 against 8.5 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l) between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 0.1, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l)?
- New Zealand ranks 94th and Serbia ranks 91st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.