Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L)
Malawi
4.3
in 2014
Zimbabwe
4.6
in 2014
Malawi rank
175th
Zimbabwe rank
172nd
Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4.6 against 4.3 in Malawi, a difference of 0.3.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 189 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.82 | 3.01 | 1.19 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 2.65 | 3.61 | 0.96 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 3.54 | 4.32 | 0.78 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 4.14 | 4.56 | 0.42 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l), Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4.6 against 4.3 in Malawi as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l) between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l)?
- Malawi ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.