Cuba vs Malta: Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L)
Cuba
10.2
in 2014
Malta
10.1
in 2014
Cuba rank
47th
Malta rank
50th
Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) over time
- Cuba
- Malta
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 10.2 against 10.1 in Malta, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malta ahead.
Cuba ranks 47th and Malta ranks 50th of 189 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.7 | 7.08 | 1.38 | Malta |
| 1990s | 6.67 | 7.87 | 1.2 | Malta |
| 2000s | 8.11 | 9.15 | 1.04 | Malta |
| 2010s | 9.7 | 9.92 | 0.22 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l), Cuba or Malta?
- Cuba, at 10.2 against 10.1 in Malta as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l) between Cuba and Malta?
- 0.1, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l)?
- Cuba ranks 47th and Malta ranks 50th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.