Naoero vs Sur: Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L)
Naoero
29.2
in 2014
Sur
12.3
in 2014
Naoero rank
1st
Sur rank
2nd
Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) over time
- Naoero
- Sur
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 29.2 against 12.3 in Sur, a difference of 16.9.
That makes Naoero's figure about 2.4 times Sur's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 26.86 | 7.74 | 19.12 | Naoero |
| 1990s | 29.52 | 8.84 | 20.68 | Naoero |
| 2000s | 29.6 | 10.35 | 19.25 | Naoero |
| 2010s | 29.2 | 11.84 | 17.36 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l), Naoero or Sur?
- Naoero, at 29.2 against 12.3 in Sur as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l) between Naoero and Sur?
- 16.9, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Sur?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Naoero and Sur rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l)?
- Naoero ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.