Mus vs Nauru: Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) … age-standardized
Mus
13
in 2014
Nauru
29.2
in 2014
Mus rank
1st
Nauru rank
1st
Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) … age-standardized over time
- Mus
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 29.2 against 13 in Mus, a difference of 16.2.
That makes Nauru's figure about 2.2 times Mus's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Mus ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 2 regions.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 8.73 | 26.86 | 18.13 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 10.54 | 29.52 | 18.98 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 11.91 | 29.6 | 17.69 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 12.74 | 29.2 | 16.46 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l), Mus or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 29.2 against 13 in Mus as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l) between Mus and Nauru?
- 16.2, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Nauru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Mus and Nauru rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l)?
- Mus ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.