Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L)
Kiribati
22.3
in 2014
Tuvalu
23.8
in 2014
Kiribati rank
8th
Tuvalu rank
6th
Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) over time
- Kiribati
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 23.8 against 22.3 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.5.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 8th and Tuvalu ranks 6th of 189 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 8.76 | 10.7 | 1.94 | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 13.9 | 16.04 | 2.14 | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 18.96 | 20.5 | 1.54 | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 21.64 | 23.12 | 1.48 | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l), Kiribati or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 23.8 against 22.3 in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l) between Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 1.5, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and Tuvalu rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l)?
- Kiribati ranks 8th and Tuvalu ranks 6th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.