Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Zimbabwe: Raised blood pressure (SBP>=140 OR DBP>=90)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
35.03
in 2019
Zimbabwe
35.33
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
52nd
Zimbabwe rank
51st
Raised blood pressure (SBP>=140 OR DBP>=90) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 35.33 against 35.03 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.3.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 194 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.03 | 37.41 | 0.3796 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 37.04 | 38.93 | 1.89 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 35.67 | 37.28 | 1.61 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised blood pressure (sbp>=140 or dbp>=90), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 35.33 against 35.03 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in raised blood pressure (sbp>=140 or dbp>=90) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zimbabwe rank globally for raised blood pressure (sbp>=140 or dbp>=90)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 51st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised blood pressure (SBP>=140 OR DBP>=90) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.