SEAR vs South Sudan: Proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and
SEAR
37.5%
in 2023
South Sudan
94.3%
in 2023
SEAR rank
6th
South Sudan rank
7th
Proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and over time
- SEAR
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 94.3% against 37.5% in SEAR, a difference of 56.8%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.5 times SEAR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was SEAR ahead.
SEAR ranks 6th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 13 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, SEAR averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | SEAR | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.2% | 66.2% | 22.1% | SEAR |
| 2000s | 84.6% | 86.2% | 1.5% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 69.3% | 92.8% | 23.6% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 43.6% | 94.1% | 50.5% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and, SEAR or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 94.3% against 37.5% in SEAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and between SEAR and South Sudan?
- 56.8%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for SEAR and South Sudan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do SEAR and South Sudan rank globally for proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and?
- SEAR ranks 6th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and technologies for cooking, by fuel type (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.