AMR vs South Sudan: Proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and
AMR
33.6%
in 2023
South Sudan
94.3%
in 2023
AMR rank
8th
South Sudan rank
7th
Proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and over time
- AMR
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 94.3% against 33.6% in AMR, a difference of 60.7%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.8 times AMR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was AMR ahead.
AMR ranks 8th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 13 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.1% | 66.2% | 5.1% | South Sudan |
| 2000s | 51.0% | 86.2% | 35.2% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 42.3% | 92.8% | 50.5% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 35.1% | 94.1% | 59.0% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and, AMR or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 94.3% against 33.6% in AMR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and between AMR and South Sudan?
- 60.7%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and South Sudan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do AMR and South Sudan rank globally for proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and?
- AMR ranks 8th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of population with primary reliance on fuels and technologies for cooking, by fuel type (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.